Fixed-scope workflow reliability diagnostic

Find the failure path before changing the workflow.

A EUR 150 written diagnostic for one n8n or Make workflow issue: duplicate writes, API rate limits, stuck jobs, fragile CRM handoffs, or unclear error recovery.

Request invoice View audit demo

EUR 150

Diagnostic

Paid upfront by B2B invoice or payment request. If the fix is narrow enough, it can be applied inside the diagnostic scope; otherwise the diagnostic becomes the implementation spec.

Request invoice

Likely Next Step

EUR 300-500

Typical fixed implementation range for one bounded workflow repair after the diagnostic, depending on credentials, test access, and the number of external systems involved.

Deliverables

Designed for teams that need a practical repair path, not a vague audit.

Failure Map

Where the workflow can drop, duplicate, stall, over-retry, or silently corrupt records.

Repair Plan

A small set of concrete changes, acceptance checks, and any required owner-system decisions.

Fixed Quote

If implementation is larger than the diagnostic, you get the scoped build price before work starts.

What To Send

No production credentials, API keys, passwords, or customer data are needed for the first pass.

Workflow Export

An n8n JSON export or screenshots of the relevant path. Redact credentials and private data.

Sample Payloads

One expected input, one current bad output or error, and the expected result.

System Rules

Rate limits, unique keys, retry rules, owner system, and any must-not-break behavior.

Good Fit

  • Duplicate orders or CRM records.
  • API 429/rate-limit failures.
  • Jobs stuck in processing after crashes.
  • Webhook-to-CRM or Airtable/Sheets handoff bugs.
  • One workflow where the failure can be reproduced or described.

Not A Fit

  • Requests requiring shared passwords or raw secrets in chat.
  • Unbounded rebuilds of a whole automation stack.
  • Medical, legal, financial, or compliance advice beyond workflow mechanics.
  • Bulk outreach, scraping, or messaging systems without consent/compliance boundaries.
  • Production changes before payment and acceptance criteria.
Proof asset The synthetic n8n audit demo shows the style of first-pass checks: timeouts, retries, idempotency hints, disabled nodes, secret-like parameters, unsafe item access, and missing error paths.